vendredi 22 novembre 2013

Neuropsychological Profile of Dementia with Lewy Bodies

Neuropsychological Profile of Dementia with Lewy Bodies | Health tips img#wpstats{display:none} Health tips empower your best health and live longer!Home pageDiet & FitnessDietDiet tipsFitnessCardioStrengthYogaDiseasesAlphabeticalAids & HivAllergiesBack PainCancerBreast CancerCervical CancerColon CancerLung cancerProstate CancerCholesterolCold & FluDiabetesHeart DiseaseOsteoporosisFamily HealthChild’s healthMen’s healthWomen’s healthLegalHealth InsuranceLife careNutritionEat rightRecipesMind and BodyBeautySkin careMindAnxietyDepressionHeadachesPersonalityStressWellnessAgingChild’s healthOral careQuit SmokingMen’s healthSleepWomen’s healthMenopause Your Are Here: Health tips ? Mind and Body ? Mind ? Neuropsychological Profile of Dementia with Lewy Bodies

Neuropsychological Profile of Dementia with Lewy BodiesNovember 14, 2013 - Jean-Paul Marat + - Mind - Tagged: Alzheimer, Alzheimers Disease, dementia, Dementia with Lewy bodies, Lewy body, Parkinson's disease - no comments(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is considered to be the second most common form of neurodegenerative dementia after Alzheimer’s disease (AD). It is characterized neuropathologically by the presence of Lewy bodies; those are detectable in post-mortem brain biopsies. The clinical core features of DLB are fluctuation in cognitive function, recurrent visual hallucinations, and the spontaneous features of parkinsonism. Those core features, however, demonstrate a low frequency in patients with AD. If those features were clearly present, then it would be simple to differenti­ate DLB from AD. However, not all patients with DLB manifest such core features early in the course of the disease. It is therefore often difficult to accurately diagnose DLB, especially at the initial presentation.

The need for an early and accurate diagnosis of DLB in order to admin­ister the proper clinical treatment has been emphasized by reports of severe neuroleptic sensitivity and the preferential response to cholinest- erase inhibitors in these patients. Therefore, the ability to accurately diag­nose the cause of dementia could be of great medical benefit. An analysis of the neuropsychological profile was carried out, while various brain imaging techniques were also investigated with the aim of establishing an early diagnosis of DLB. The neuropsychological profile of DLB consists of a poor attentional, executive, and constructional function and a better short- and medium-term recall than those of AD. In the present post, the history of research, pathology, clinical symptoms, cognitive profiles, and differential clinical diagnosis of DLB is reviewed.

HISTORY OF RESEARCHLewy bodies were first seen and linked to Parkinson’s disease (“paral­ysis agitans”) in 1912 by the German neurologist Frederic Lewy. Lewy bodies appear as spherical masses that displace other cell components. There are two morphological types of Lewy bodies, namely, brainstem and cortical types. A brainstem Lewy body is an eosinophilic cytoplas­mic inclusion that consists of a dense core surrounded by a halo, mea­suring approximately 10 nm in diameter, of radiating fibrils, the primary structural component of which is alpha-synuclein. Hematoxylin and eosin staining is not sufficient for the detection of cortical Lewy bodies and it is also not capable of detecting Lewy neurites. Initially, Lewy did not ascribe any neurobehavioral significance to the Lewy bodies observed in posten­cephalitic parkisonian patients in 1912.

Okazaki et al. reported two cases of elderly patients of European extraction who exhibited progressive dementia and quadriparesis in flex­ion (Okazaki et al. 1961). The neuropathology of these two patients was characterized by the presence of numerous Lewy bodies in the cerebral cortex as well as in the brainstem. Although these inclusion bodies lacked the distinctive halo of brainstem Lewy bodies, this group of investigators established an association between these cerebral inclusions and demen­tia. Their report did not receive much academic attention for approxi­mately 15 years. However, Ikeda et al. reported a dementia case involving a young person with parkinsonism (Ikeda et al. 1975).

Kosaka et al. reported an autopsied case with progressive dementia and parkinsonism, and the neuropathologic features demonstrated the wide­spread presence of Lewy bodies thoroughout the central nervous system as well as Alzheimer’s changes (Kosaka et al. 1976). Kosaka described three cases with a distribution of cortical Lewy bodies (Kosaka 1978). Thereafter, many similar cases were reported in Japan. In addition, Kosaka and Meh- raein reported German cases with progressive dementia and parkinsonism (Kosaka and Mehraein 1979). The neuropathology of these cases was char­acterized by the widespread occurrence of Lewy bodies. These were the first cases reported in Europe. Kosaka et al. examined 20 cases with “Lewy body disease” and classified this disease pathologically into three types: brainstem, transitional, and diffuse (Kosaka et al. 1980). Yoshimura con­firmed their findings and proposed the term “diffuse Lewy body disease” (DLBD) (Yoshimura et al. 1983). Kosaka et al. suggested that DLBD had been overlooked in both European and American countries, since only a few DLBD cases had been reported in those countries (Kosaka et al. 1984). Since 1985, a number of DLBD cases have been reported in both North American and European countries.

Similar terminology has been proposed by several researchers, such as diffuse cortical Lewy body dementia, senile dementia of Lewy body type, and Lewy body variant of Alzheimer’s disease. To resolve the confusion in naming this disease, the generic term “dementia with Lewy bod­ies” (DLB) was proposed to include those disorders in the first Interna­tional Workshop on Lewy Body Dementia held in Newcastle-upon-Tyne in 1995. The results of this workshop were reported in 1996 (McKeith et al. 1996) . Consensus criteria for clinical and pathologic diagnosis of DLB were thereafter published. The clinical criteria for probable DLB showed sufficient specificity, but poor sensitivity. From this standpoint, the revised criteria for the clinical diagnosis of DLB were thereafter pro­posed at the third international workshop meeting on DLB held in New­castle-upon-Tyne in 2003 and later were published in 2005 (McKeith et al. 2005). Recently DLB, Parkinson^ disease (PD), and Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD) have been identified as belonging to the spectrum of Lewy body disease.

PATHOLOGYFrom a pathological standpoint, DLB is a common disorder of the alpha-synuclein metabolism characterized by the development of abnor­mal cytoplasmic inclusions, called Lewy bodies, throughout the brain. A Lewy body is the pathologic aggregation of alpha-synuclein. It is also associated with intermediate filaments, chaperone proteins, and elements of the ubiquitin-proteasome system.

DLB was originally defined as a clinicopathologic entity with a spe­cific constellation of the clinical features, and a descriptive approach was proposed for assessing the neuropathology of this disease (McKeith et al. 1996). The only neuropathologic requirement for DLB was the presence of Lewy bodies somewhere in the brain of a patient with a clinical history of dementia. Other pathologic features, such as senile plaques and neuron loss (frequently seen in AD), could also occur; however, they are not either inclusive or exclusive to the diagnosis of DLB. As increasingly sensitive methods for detecting Lewy bodies have been developed, as many as 60% of AD cases may thus be considered to meet the pathologic criteria for DLB based on the 1996 criteria. In addition, none of these patients nor­mally demonstrated the clinical symptoms of DLB.

New recommendations have thus been proposed which take into account both the extent of Lewy-related pathology and AD-type pathol­ogy in assessing the degree of certainty that the neuropathologic findings explain the DLB clinical symptoms.

Lewy bodies are present in DLB as well as in PD. In addition, there is a loss of dopamine-producing neurons (in the substantia nigra) similar to that seen in PD and a loss of acetylcholine (ACh)-producing neurons (in the nucleus basalis of Meynert [NBM]and elsewhere) similar to that seen in AD. Cerebral atrophy (or shrinkage) also occurs as the cerebral cortex degenerates. Autopsy series have revealed the pathology of DLB to often be concomitant with the pathology of AD. Namely, when Lewy body inclusions are found in the cortex, they often co-occur with the AD pathology found primarily in the hippocampus, including neurofibrillary tangles (abnormally phosphorylated tau protein), senile plaques (amyloid protein deposits), and granulovacuolar degeneration. Kosaka and col­leagues proposed two distinct pathological subtypes of DLB: (1) the com­mon form, found in approximately 75% of cases, with a mixed Lewy body and amyloid pathology; and (2) the pure form, with only the Lewy body pathology ( Kosaka 1990 ).

Within DLB, the loss of cholinergic (ACh-producing) neurons is thought to account for the degradation of cognitive and emotional functioning, as in AD, whereas the loss of dopaminergic (dopamine-producing) neurons is thought to account for the degradation of motor control, as is observed in PD. Therefore, DLB is similar to the dementia resulting from both AD and PD. In fact, DLB is often confused in its early stages with AD and/or vascular dementia (multi-infarct dementia). The overlap of neuropathol­ogies and presenting symptoms (cognitive, emotional, and motor) may therefore make an accurate differential diagnosis difficult to make.

CLINICAL SYMPTOMSAccording to the revised criteria for the clinical diagnosis of DLB (McKeith et al. 1996), the clinical diagnosis of probable or possible DLB essentially requires a progressive disabling mental impairment. At least two of three core features are sufficient for the diagnosis of probable DLB, and one for possible DLB. The three core features consist of fluctuation, visual hallucinations, and parkinsonism. The suggestive clinical features include rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder, severe neu­roleptic sensitivity, and a low dopamine transporter uptake in the basal ganglia as demonstrated by either single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.

In the absence of two core features, the diagnosis of probable DLB can also be made if dementia plus at least one suggestive feature is present with one core feature. Possible DLB can be diagnosed with the presence of dementia plus one core or suggestive feature.

Progressive Disabling Mental Impairment

A progressive disabling mental impairment is a mandatory require­ment for the diagnosis of DLB. This leads to the development of global dementia, sometimes over a period of months but more commonly over a period of several years. The rate of longitudinal cognitive decline for DLB is equivalent to that for AD; however, the risk of mortality for DLB is higher than that for AD. The greater risk for a progression of noncognitive symptoms (e.g., parkinsonism) for DLB than for AD is considered to result in the clinically meaningful differences in these two disorders.

The demonstration of cognitive impairment by formal testing of the mental status such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is an essential component in establishing the diagnosis. However, prominent or persistent memory impairment may not necessarily occur in the early stages because of the relative preservation of confrontation naming and short- and medium-term recall as well as recognition for patients with DLB. In such cases, a prominent or persistent memory impairment become usually evident with progression over time.

Parkinson’s Disease Dementia (PDD) and DLB

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases. It is characterized by the progressive degeneration of dopamin­ergic neurons in the substantia nigra and the accumulation of Lewy bod­ies in the surviving neurons. PD belongs to a group of conditions called movement disorders. It is characterized by muscle rigidity, tremor, a slow­ing of the physical movement (bradykinesia), and, in extreme cases, a loss of physical movement (akinesia). The primary symptoms are the results of a decreased stimulation of the motor cortex by the basal ganglia, nor­mally caused by the insufficient formation and action of dopamine, which is produced in the dopaminergic neurons of the brain. Secondary symp­toms may include a high-level cognitive dysfunction and subtle language problems. PD is both chronic and progressive.

Many patients with PD develop dementia, typically 10 years or more after the onset of motor symptoms. Such patients are diagnosed to have Parkinson disease dementia (PDD). The term PDD should be used to
describe dementia that occurs in the context of well-established PD. The term DLB should be diagnosed when dementia occurs either before or concurrently with parkinsonism. When a patient developed parkinsonism more than one year before developing dementia, then a diagnosis of PDD is given. When parkinsonism and dementia begin within one year or if the parkinsonism starts after the onset of dementia, then a diagnosis of DLB is made. This is called the “one year rule.” The clinical distinction between DLB and PDD is based solely on the temporal sequence in the appearance of symptoms. No major differences between DLB and PDD have been found in any variable examined, including the cognitive pro­file, attentional performance, neuropsychiatric features, sleep disorders, autonomic dysfunction, type and severity of parkinsonism, neuroleptic sensitivity, and responsiveness to cholinesterase inhibitors. Upon autopsy, DLB and PDD are also difficult to distinguish because abnormal neuronal alpha-synuclein inclusions are the common pathologic process of both PDD and DLB.

Fluctuation

Fluctuation in the cognitive function is common in DLB. In the earliest stages, patients may show deficits in their cognitive function and global performance that alternate with periods of normal or near-normal perfor­mance. Fluctuation may be based on pronounced variations in attention and alertness. DLB patients may show improved performance in response to environmental novelty and increased arousal (sometimes confounding formal cognitive testing), but these effects are usually only short-lived. The periodicity and amplitude of fluctuations are variable, both between the subjects and within the same individual. They are described as occur­ring rapidly (lasting minutes or hours), as well as slower (weekly or monthly) variations. Substantial changes in the mental status and behav­ior may therefore be seen both within the duration of a single interview and/or between consecutive examinations. No typical diurnal pattern of fluctuation has been identified in DLB. Some patients identify the variable cognitive state themselves, but generally the most productive approach for identifying such fluctuation is via a reliable informant.

The fluctuations resemble signs of delirium without any identifiable precipitants of such mental-status changes. The report of fluctuations in DLB is widely discrepant and it ranges from 13% to 85% with a low clinician inter-rater reliability. There are inconsistencies among studies regarding what is considered sufficient to constitute the designation of fluctuations. To some degree, most people can experience some variability
in cognition, abilities, or alertness. Therefore, for clinical purposes, it is imperative to identify those aspects of fluctuations that are particularly prominent to DLB and that can be consistently elicited from informant reports. The differential diagnosis of fluctuating cognition may include several conditions, including delirium due to medication toxicity or inter­current illness. There are substantial difficulties inherent in defining and quantifying fluctuating cognition, particularly later in the illness when variability may become submerged in progressive cognitive deterioration. Questions such as “are there episodes when his/her thinking seems to be quite clear and then later becomes muddled?” were previously suggested as useful probes, but a recent study found 72% of both AD and DLB care givers respond positively. The study using the Mayo Fluctuations Com­posite Scale (Ferman et al. 2004) suggested that 4 of 19 items of structured questionnaire assessing fluctuations were found to significantly differenti­ate DLB from AD. These four items are as follows:

1.   Are there times when the patient’s flow of ideas seems disorganized, unclear, or not logical?2.    How often is the patient drowsy and lethargic during the day?a.    All the time or several times a dayb.    Once a day or less3.    How much time does the patient spend sleeping during the day (before 7: 00 pm)?c.    2 hours or mored.   Less than 2 hours”4.    Does the patient stare into space for long periods of time?Three or more “positive” responses from caregivers to these four ques­tions yield a positive predictive value of 83% for the clinical diagnosis of DLB against an alternate diagnosis of AD. Conversely, two or less “posi­tive” responses yield a negative predictive value of 70% for the absence of a clinical diagnosis of DLB in favor of AD.

Visual Hallucinations

Visual hallucinations, which are typically recurrent, formed, and detailed, have been described by most groups investigating DLB. Visual hallucinations appear to be the only psychotic symptom that reliably dis­criminates DLB from AD. They are generally present early in the course of illness. Hallucinations in other modalities, particularly auditory, may also occur in DLB but do so less frequently. Informant-based assessment tools such as the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) are helpful both to screen for visual hallucinations and to assess their severity and frequency but do not always distinguish them from hallucinations in other sensory modalities. Caregivers tend to underreport visual hallucinations and patients with mild to moderate cognitive impairment can contribute use­ful information about their presence and quality. Patients with mild to moderate DLB tend to remember their experience of visual hallucina­tions because of their relatively preserved memory function.

Prominent cognitive impairment on visuoperceptual and spatial functions may be one of the causes of visual hallucination. Patients with DLB with visual hallucinations show more profound visuoperceptual dysfunction in comparison to those without hallucinations. There is considerable over­lap between true visual hallucinatory symptoms (in the absence of an adequate external stimulus) and other perceptual disorders, including misidentification syndromes and visual agnosias. Patients may describe visual hallucinations, such as seeing faces emerging out of the patterns on chair cushions. Typical themes are animate objects of people or ani­mals intruding into the patient’ s home. Inanimate objects can also be seen. Abstract perceptions such as characteristics on walls or ceiling are not unusual. The visual hallucinations are characteristically seen and described in considerable detail. Emotional responses vary through fear, amusement, or indifference, and a degree of insight into their unreality is often present. The precise descriptions of visual hallucination in DLB are similar to those described in association with delirium due to systemic disturbances.

Antiparkinsonian medications, such as levodopa or anticholinergics could also be the cause of visual hallucinations as a side effect. Antiparkin­sonian medications are often used for parkinsonisan symptoms in patients with DLB. However, their role of the hallucinatory symptoms of DLB has not yet been systematically investigated. Visual hallucinations that do not recede, or vanish very slowly, after the withdrawal of antiparkinsonian medications in PD patients may therefore be predictive of a subsequent progressive cognitive decline and dementia.

Increased numbers of Lewy bodies in the anterior and inferior tempo­ral lobe and amygdale at autopsy are associated with the presence and onset of visual hallucinations. Each of these areas is implicated in the gen­eration of complex visual images. Brain perfusion imaging demonstrates a reduced occipital uptake in areas identified as primary and secondary visual cortex in DLB patients. Visual hallucinations are associated with greater deficits in cortical acetylcholine and their presence may predict a good response to cholinergic therapy.

Parkinsonism

The severity of extrapyramidal motor features in DLB is generally similar to that of age-matched patients with PD either with or without dementia with an average 10% annual progression rate. Rigidity and bra- dykinesia are the usual extrapyramidal symptoms, while other common findings are hypophonic speech, masked faces, a stooped posture, and a slow and shuffling gait. Resting tremors are less common, especially in older individuals. The assessment of motor features may be complicated by the presence of a cognitive impairment. The order of onset of mental and motor symptoms is variable, particularly in older patients who often present with a complex admixture of extrapyramidal and mental symp­toms of almost simultaneous onset.

In advanced AD and other dementias, parkinsonian signs may also be found. Parkinsonism appearing for the first time late in the course of a dementia is therefore consistent with a diagnosis of DLB, but it is not spe­cific for it. Neuroleptics, even at low doses, may induce parkinsonism in elderly or demented patients. DLB may thus be distinguished from drug- induced parkinsonism by the persistence of motor symptoms after the withdrawal of neuroleptics.

Levodopa responsiveness in DLB is almost certainly less than that in uncomplicated PD, possibly because of intrinsic striatal degeneration and the fact that a significant proportion of the parkinsonian symptoms may be non-dopaminergic in origin. However, levodopa can be used for the motor disorder of both DLB and PDD. Medication should generally be introduced at low doses and thereafter be increased slowly to the mini­mum required dose in order to minimize any potential disability without exacerbating the psychiatric symptoms. However, the administration of anticholinergics should be avoided.

REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD)

There is a clear electroencephalographic (EEG) difference between sleep and the waking state in the human brain. EEG is the recording of electrical activity along the scalp produced by the firing of neurons within the brain. The EEG during sleep is divided into at least two categories. One type of sleep was found to be associated with the occurrence of dreams and the other with nondream sleep. Since dream sleep was found to be accom­panied by episodes of REM, this state is often called REM sleep. Non­dream sleep is also called non-REM sleep. Another prominent component of REM sleep is the profound paralysis of the skeletal muscles. REM sleep paralysis has been shown to be due to a small region of the dorsal pons, the nucleus subcoeruleus. A lesion to this nucleus abolishes the REM sleep paralysis. A very dramatic observation is that during REM sleep, cats with such lesions were observed to become very active and agitated, as if they were acting out an emotionally charged dream episode. Additional nuclei and neurotransmitters of the lower brainstem participate in the process of muscle atonia that occur during REM sleep.

Patients with DLB often show the REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), which is manifested by vivid and often frightening dreams during REM sleep without muscle atonia. Patients therefore appear to “act out their dreams” vocalizing, flailing limbs, and moving around the bed sometimes violently. Vivid visual images are often reported, although the patient may have little recall of these episodes. The history is obtained from the bed partner, who may report many years of this sleep disorder prior to the onset of dementia and parkinsonism. RBD is frequently associated with an underlying synucleinopathy—PD, DLB, or multiple system atrophy (MSA)—and only rarely with other neurodegenerative disorders such as AD. Associated sleep disorders in DLB including excessive daytime drowsiness may also contribute to the fluctuating pattern. Screening ques­tions about the presence of day- and nighttime sleep disturbance should always be asked, facilitated by the use of sleep questionnaires, particu­larly those that query bed partners about a history of repeated episodes of “acting out dreams.” The diagnosis of RBD may also be confirmed by polysomnography.

Severe Neuroleptic Sensitivity

Neuroleptics (also called antipsychotics) are a group of psychoactive drugs commonly but not exclusively used to treat psychosis, which is typ­ified by schizophrenia, but can also be present in severe bipolar disorder, as well as many other conditions. Neuroleptics were originally developed to treat schizophrenia. Recently, these drugs have also come to be used to treat nonpsychotic disorders. For example, some neuroleptics (haloperidol) are used to treat Tourette syndrome, whereas aripiprazole and risperidone are prescribed in some cases of Asperger syndrome. Some neuroleptics such as quetiapine have multiple uses including acting as an augmenta­tion agent in the treatment of mental illness such as anxiety, insomnia, autism, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuroleptics (antipsychotics) are broadly divided into two groups, the typical antipsychotics and the atypical antipsychotics. Atypical antipsychotics are generally considered to be more effective for the treatment of psychiatric symptoms, such as delusion or hallucination, and to have fewer adverse effects, including parkinsonism, in comparison to typical antipsychotics. The behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are common and prob­lematic in clinical practice and represent a significant part of the day-to- day workload of the old-age psychiatry teams in hospitals, institutions, and community settings. Atypical antipsychotics may be used off-label to treat BPSD, particularly in care homes for the elderly.

A severe adverse reaction to medication with neuroleptics often occurs in patients with DLB. Neuroleptics can bring about the appearance or severe exacerbation of extrapyramidal signs in DLB. Severe neuroleptic reactions include rigidity, reduced consciousness, pyrexia, falling, pos­tural hypotension, and collapse. Approximately 50% of all patients with DLB receiving typical or atypical antipsychotic agents do not react so adversely. Therefore, a history of neuroleptic tolerance does not rule out a diagnosis of DLB. In contrast, a positive history of severe neuroleptic sen­sitivity is strongly suggestive of DLB. The deliberate use of neuroleptics as a diagnostic tool for DLB should be avoided because a previous study reported that a high morbidity and mortality associated with neuroleptic sensitivity reactions of DLB which are characterized by the acute onset or exacerbation of parkinsonism and impaired consciousness.

Dopamine Transporter Imaging

Functional imaging of the dopamine transporter (DAT) defines the integrity of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system and currently has its main clinical application in assisting the diagnosis of DLB. Imaging with specific ligands for DAT provides a marker for presynaptic neuronal degeneration. DAT imaging is abnormal in idiopathic PD, MSA, and pro­gressive supranuclear palsy. Low striatal DAT activity also occurs in DLB but it is normal in AD, thus making DAT scanning particularly useful for distinguishing DLB from AD.

Depression

Depression is common in both DLB and PDD and there have been no systematic studies of its management to date.

Neuroimaging

The ability to diagnose the cause of dementia could be of great medical benefit. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, SPECT, and PET have been investigated with the aim of establishing an early diagnosis. PET has higher sensitivity and higher spatial resolution than SPECT, thus making it more appropriate for the diagnosis of early-stage dementias (Ishii and Minoshima 2005). However, SPECT has the advantage of lower cost and has been widely used in general hospitals, and therefore it is useful in many clinical examinations. During the last several years, a voxel-based analysis of brain PET and SPECT images has been widely applied for the clinical diagnosis of AD and dementia using PET or SPECT. To promote further objective and reproducible data, there has also been recent inter­est in the development and application of automated algorithms for brain PET/SPECT images. Ishii et al. (2009) developed a fully automated diag­nosis system for early AD and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) using the NEUROSTAT program for the analysis of FDG-PET images (Kono et al. 2007) . Ishii et al. (2009) further developed this system to provide a fully automated diagnosis of early-stage neurodegenerative dementia. They aimed to distinguish AD/DLB from non-AD/DLB dementia and then DLB from AD for therapeutic decisionmaking. According to their report, diagnoses by experienced neuroradiologists were more accurate in patients with very mild AD than those by radiologists whose subspecialty were not neuroradiology, although their accuracy slightly decreased when diagnosing DLB. The problem is that it is very difficult to distinguish a patient with mild DLB from a patient with mild late-onset AD. On the con­trary, this automated system is independent of observer skill and showed good results comparable to those achieved by experienced observers. The automated diagnosis system’s diagnostic value was therefore considered to be comparable to that of experienced neuroradiologists.

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILEThe clinical diagnosis of DLB can be difficult because of the variability and the overlap of symptoms between DLB and other related dementias, notably AD. The clinical manifestation of DLB and AD can be very similar. Both DLB patients and AD patients may initially present with a progres­sive cognitive decline without any other neurological abnormalities. The clinical diagnosis of DLB is supported and facilitated by the revised cri­teria for the clinical diagnosis of DLB (McKeith et al. 2005). In most stud­ies examining the clinical criteria for the operational diagnosis of DLB, the specificity of the diagnosis has been high, but the sensitivity has been poor.

From a neuropsychological standpoint, patients with DLB tend to manifest greater attentional and visuospatial cognitive impairments than
those with AD, whereas patients with AD involve more profound episodic memory impairment than those with DLB. Using those neuropsychologi­cal differences, a careful cognitive assessment may therefore aid in the differential diagnosis between DLB and AD. Neuropsychological research on DLB can provide theoretical insight into the nature of the underlying impairments. There has been a need for studies examining the neuropsy­chological profile of DLB and the contribution of a neuropsychological evaluation to the diagnostic workup. In the rest of this post, the cog­nitive functions of patients with DLB including the attentional function, visuoperceptual and executive functions, and memory function will be reviewed.

Attentional Function

Attention is the cognitive process of selectively concentrating on one aspect of the environment while ignoring other things. Attention has also been referred to as the allocation of processing resources. Attention is a multi-dimensional concept that describes different aspects of processing and responding to information, including automatic processes such as visual orienting and higher-level processes of attentional control.

There have been studies demonstrating a greater attentional impair­ment in DLB than in AD. Hansen et al. (1990) compared nine patients with DLB with nine patients with AD. More severe deficits of attentional function (digit span sub-test from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale- Revised [WAIS-R]) were seen in DLB. Sahgal et al. (1992) reported that DLB patients had significantly greater impairment on a computerized delayed matching-to-sample task. Ayre et al. (1998) used the Cognitive Drug Research Computerized Assessment System for Dementia Patients (COGDRAS-D) computerized test battery to compare attention in 46 patients with AD and 24 patients with DLB. The DLB group performed significantly worse on simple reaction time (SRT) and choice reaction time (CRT) tasks and digit vigilance (VIG) in comparison to the AD group. Ballard et al. (2001) compared 85 patients with DLB with 80 patients with AD using the COGDRAS-D. They reported a slowed processing speed, attentional impairments, and fluctuations in attentional impairments to be significantly more severe in DLB than AD patients. The DLB patients were significantly more impaired than the AD patients on all tests of attention and fluctuating attention.

In both DLB and AD, most measures of attentional performance and most indices of fluctuating attention were significantly correlated with the MMSE score. The severity and fluctuation of attentional impairments are
particularly pronounced in DLB patients with MMSE scores of 10 or less. They concluded that their results confirmed that the attentional deficits and fluctuations in attention are substantially more severe in DLB patients than in patients with AD. A number of other factors, such as parkinsonism with a slowed motor speed, depression, or a general slowing of the cogni­tive processing speed could theoretically have contributed to these find­ings. They noticed that deficits of attention became more pronounced with increasing dementia severity and, hence, that these deficits need to be interpreted within the context of overall cognitive deficits. Oda et al. (2009) compared 26 patients with DLB with 78 patients with AD and dem­onstrated that patients with AD had significantly greater scores on the weighted sum score of the attention of Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) than did patients with DLB (P = 0.0010).

The overall pattern is consistent, with DLB patients thus showing a significantly greater impairment on a range of attentional tasks. Both neuropsychological and clinical observations strongly suggest that DLB patients experience great difficulty in maintaining attention. The neural basis of the attentional impairment in DLB requires further investigation, but it is likely that a dysfunction of the basal forebrain cholinergic system is involved. Several lines of evidence support this proposal. Cholinergic neuronal loss and the depletion of choline acetyltransferase are seen early in DLB (Tiraboschi et al. 2002). The administration of anticholinergic drugs can disturb the attention and cause hallucinations, whereas cholinesterase inhibitors can improve cognition in DLB.

Visuoperceptual Function

Visuoperceptual function is the ability to perceive an object’s visual properties (such as shape, color, and texture) and apply semantic attri­butes to the object, which includes the understanding of its use, previous experience with the object and how it relates to others.

Numerous studies have observed greater impairments in DLB in com­parison to AD on visuoperceptual tasks. Ala et al. (2001) compared 17 patients with autopsy-confirmed DLB and 27 patients with autopsy- confirmed AD by using copies of the double pentagon from the MMSE. They showed that only two patients with DLB drew the pentagon accept­ably, in contrast with 16 AD patients, and that an unacceptable copy of the pentagon was associated with DLB with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 59%. They concluded that their results confirmed the greater visuoperceptual impairment of patients with DLB than for the patients with AD and thus suggested that the pentagon copying task of the MMSE may be useful in a diagnostic sense. Cormack et al. (2004) reported that patients with DLB were found to draw significantly worse double penta­gons than those with AD or PD. In their report, a correlation between the MMSE score and the pentagon drawing score was observed in patients with AD; however, DLB patients did not show any significant correlation between the MMSE scores and the pentagon drawing score.

)n order to investigate the hypothesis that DLB patients have a dif­ferent neuropsychological basis to their drawing impairments in com­parison to the other dementia groups, the global cognitive performance of subjects was measured using the cognitive section of the Cambridge Mental Disorders in the Elderly Examination (CAMCOG). As a result, the pentagon copying scores were found to correlate significantly with all CAMCOG subscales except for the visual and recent memory in the AD group, whereas the scores of DLB patients’ scores only significantly correlated with Praxis and Perception. This result suggested that construc­tional disability was proportionate to global cognitive impairment in the AD group, but there was a dissociation of the constructional ability from the global cognitive ability in the DLB group. Mori et al. (2000) addressed problems in visual perception in patients with DLB and compared them with patients with AD. They assessed the visual perception of 24 patients with DLB and 48 patients with DLB using a subset of the object and spatial vision test battery. The discrimination of the object size task was used to examine elementary visual perception, the form discrimination task was used to examine more complex visuoperceptual function that requires the analysis of two-dimensional visual stimuli, the overlapping figure identi­fication task was used to examine the ability to actively extract concrete shapes and to recognize objects, and the visual counting task was used to examine the ability to explore and identify the spatial relationship of visual stimuli to count targets without duplication or omission. They found that DLB subjects performed more poorly than the AD group, not only in discriminating size and form and visual counting, but also in iden­tifying overlapping figures. Moreover, DLB subjects with visual hallucina­tions performed significantly worse on the overlapping figures task.

Oda et al. reported that patients with DLB scored significantly worse on the Block Design, Object Assembly, and Digit Symbol subtests of the WAIS-R than did patients with AD (Oda, Yamamoto, and Maeda 2009). Because the set of the Block Design, Object Assembly, and Digit Symbol is considered to be involved in visual perception/processing meaning­ful stimuli and visual organization, these results were considered to sug­gest that patients with DLB have a more severe impairment of both their visual perception of meaningful stimuli and visual organization than do

AD patients. They also showed that except for Comprehension, Similari­ties, and Object Assembly, all subtests and IQ of the WAIS-R showed a significant correlation with the MMSE score in the AD group. This sug­gests that the fall in IQ is proportional to the global cognitive impairment in the AD group. However, in the DLB group, no correlation was found between all subtests of the WAIS-R and MMSE score. There seemed to be a dissociation of the IQ from the global cognitive abilities in the DLB group. They ascribed the lack of any correlation between the global cog­nitive impairment and the fall in intellectual ability in the DLB group to a selective impairment of the visuoperceptual function in addition to a global cognitive impairment.

The fact that visual perceptual disturbances in patients with DLB pre­dispose them to experience visual hallucinations has important clinical implications. First, because visual hallucinations are among the strongest diagnostic predictors of DLB, the neuropsychological assessment of visual perceptual and constructional functions is critical in suspected DLB and its differentiation from AD. Indeed, visuoconstructional tasks, in combi­nation with other tests, can differentiate DLB from normal aging and from AD with high sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, a poor performance on visuoperceptual and constructional tasks may indicate the need for more careful monitoring regarding the occurrence of hallucinations.

It is likely that the occipital dysfunction is implicated in visuoperceptual abnormalities of DLB and both the ventral occipitotemporal and dorsal occipitoparietal streams have been implicated. The visuoperceptual dys­function in DLB can be attributed to accentuated damage in the occipital lobes. Albin et al. (1996) demonstrated the regional glucose metabolism to decrease in the occipital association cortex and primary visual area in six patients with autopsy proved DLB. In the study of Ishii et al. (1998), using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and PET, the glucose metabolic rate in the occipi­tal cortices was found to be significantly lower in patients with probable DLB than in controls with probable AD matched for age, sex, disease dura­tion, and MMSE score, despite similar decreases in the parietotemporal lobe in patients with DLB and AD. Similarly, a SPECT study demonstrated the occipital blood flow to be significantly lower in patients with DLB than in patients with AD. Therefore, in DLB, not only does the parietotemporal damage provoke visuocognitive dysfunctions, but occipital damage also causes disturbances of visual sensations, while also intensifying the higher- order visuocognitive dysfunctions. Defective visual perception, resulting in illusions including distortions of form, size, movement, or color, in com­bination with general defects such as confusion and mental deterioration may cause a sense of strangeness or inexplicable familiarity.

The mechanism of occipital involvement and visuoperceptual deficits in DLB is highly speculative. Bashir et al. (1998) reported a unique patient with DLB who initially complained of heaviness in the right upper extremity and then subsequently developed a dense left homonymous hemianopsia during the course of rapidly progressing dementia. Their patient fulfilled all the consensus criteria for the clinical diagnosis of probable DLB: their case exhibited a progressive cognitive decline, parkinsonism, visual hallu­cinations, and fluctuating agitation, confusion, and depression. The neuro- pathologic findings in their patient fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for DLB, proposed by the Consortium on Dementia with Lewy Bodies (McKeith et al. 1996). In addition, their patient exhibited a striking predominance of neurofibrillary tangles in the right inferotemporal and occipital cortices. However, in general, the pathologic features of DLB (including Lewy bod­ies) hardly affect the occipital lobes. In a PET study with (+)-[11C]-dihydro- tetrabenazine, a greater reduction of the blood-to-brain ligand transport occurred in occipital cortex in DLB than in AD. Bodis-Wollner (1990) spec­ulated that in patients affected by PD, as well as in the monkey model of this disease, the visual defects may be caused by a systemic dopaminergic deficiency. Conversely, involvement of the occipital cholinergic system also has been assumed. The activity of a cholinergic enzyme, namely choline acetyltransferase, is reportedly lower in the temporoparietal and occipital neocortex in patients with DLB in comparison to those with AD.

Memory

Memory is one’ s ability to remember the information that one has received previously. From the neuropsychological standpoint, there are three main stages in the process of memory: registration, storage, and recall. In the registration stage, one enters new information. In the stor­age stage, one stores registered information whether one is conscious of it or not. In the recall stage, one draws upon stored information when it is required. Persons with a normal memory function can fail to recall learned information (e.g., an examinee who forgets something he has studied). In many such cases, one is able to recall forgotten information with the aid of a hint or a cue. This means that the main problem of normal forgetfulness is in the recall stage, not in the storage stage. One cannot draw upon the stored information by the aid of a hint or a cue if he or she has failed to store it in the storage stage. Patients with dementia often fail to recall the registered information even if they are given a hint or a cue. This suggests that patients with dementia therefore have problems in the storage stage of the processing memory.

With regard to memory, in general, DLB subjects perform better on tests of episodic (declarative) memory than do AD patients, and this appears to be particularly true on tests of verbal rather than visual memory. Shi- momura et al. (1998) demonstrated that patients with DLB scored signifi­cantly better (P < 0.05) on the verbal memory subtest of the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) than did AD patients who were com­parable in the global severity of dementia and the global assessment of cognitive impairment. To determine the degree to which elementary visual perceptual dysfunction may contribute to a visual memory impairment in DLB, Oda et al. (2009) compared DLB patients with AD patients using the WMS-R. In that study, the DLB group showed significantly better scores than did the AD group on Verbal Memory (P < 0.0001) and Delayed Recall (P < 0.0001) of the WMS-R. However, the DLB and AD groups demon­strated comparable scores on Visual Memory (26.31 ± 12.64 vs. 26.42 ± 9.81, respectively; P = 0.9222). The authors speculated that the selective visuo- perceptual impairment in DLB may explain this similarity: namely, the relatively well preserved short- and medium-term recall would compen­sate for the severe visuoperceptual impairment in the DLB group on the visual memory tasks. Lambon et al. (2001) reported that both DLB and AD groups exhibited impaired performance across a range of tasks designed to assess semantic memory. Whereas patients with AD showed equivalent comprehension of written words and picture stimuli, patients with DLB demonstrated more severe semantic deficits for pictures than words.

The major pathological substrate of more severe amnestic deficits in AD relative to DLB likely reflects the burden of neurofibrillary tangles in the entorhinal cortex and surrounding medial temporal lobe regions in AD.

Neuropsychological Differentiation from AD

The diagnosis of DLB can be difficult, in particular when trying to differentiate it from AD. Neuroimaging techniques such as SPECT and PET have the ability to differentiate DLB from AD with high sensitivity and specificity. Neuroimaging techniques are often extremely costly and require a complex clinical setting whereas neuropsychological examina­tions tend to have a low cost and are practical in the general clinical set­ting. In addition, there are many neuropsychological differences between DLB and AD. The third report of the DLB consortium mentioned that a “double discrimination” can help differentiate DLB from AD, with the rel­ative preservation of confrontation naming and short- and medium-term recall as well as recognition, and a greater impairment on verbal fluency, visual perception, and performance tasks (McKeith et al. 2005).

The MMSE is one of the widely used and validated tests for measuring the level of global cognitive impairment. The MMSE is commonly used in medicine to screen for dementia. It is also used to estimate the severity of cognitive impairment at a given point in time and to follow the course of cognitive changes in an individual over time. In the time span of about 10 minutes it samples various functions, including arithmetic, memory, and orientation. The MMSE test consists of simple questions that cover various cognitive functions, such as orientation, registration, attention, recall, and visual construction. Therefore, the score of each subtest may be useful information for both diagnosing dementia as well as the total score. Ala et al. (2002) reported a retrospective study in which pathologically confirmed cases of AD and DLB could be differentiated on the basis of a subscore derived from the MMSE. Based on the greater impairment of the attentional and visuospatial functions, and the relative preservation of memory function in DLB compared with AD, they derived a weighted score, calculated as follows:

Ala score = Attention – 5/3 Memory + Construction

An Ala score <5 was associated with a pathological diagnosis of DLB with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 81%. By using the Ala score and the z-score in the medial occipital lobe from a brain SPECT study, Hanyu et al. (2006) derived a combined index of SPECT/MMSE that achieved a high discrimination between DLB and AD with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 85%. According to their report, patients with DLB and AD could be distinguished by their performance on a single dementia instrument of the MMSE. The DLB group performed significantly worse than the AD group on the Attention and Copy design, while the AD group demonstrated poorer performance than the DLB group on the Word Recall. Oda et al. (2009) derived a weighted score consisting of the Object Assembly subtest of the WAIS-R and the Logical Memory II subtest of the WMS-R to differentiate DLB from AD15 that had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 76%.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONSGiven that DLB is a relatively new disease concept, most of the work so far has been concerned with the first step of the characterization and description of DLB as a separate disease. Most of these studies suggest that in the early stages of the disease, DLB patients tend to exhibit pro­nounced visual-perceptual, attentional, and frontal executive impairments, whereas the memory functions are generally less impaired than in AD patients. However, given the overlap and variability of the symptoms, the neuropsychological profile of DLB has not yet been clearly distinguished from that of AD. In the future, the challenge of DLB research will lie in developing a theoretical model that can link evidence from pathophysi­ological and imaging studies with clinical and neuropsychological data, which will therefore facilitate the treatment of this disease.

Share this Health tip:Share on Tumblr Pin ItMorePocketPrintEmailGoogle+ Jean-Paul MaratLike this:Like Loading...

You may also like:

Cognitive Screening and Neuropsychological and Functional Assessment: Contributions to Early Detection of Dementia As the elderly population increases, dementia and depression have become the most prevalent neuropsychiatric disorders among aged indi­viduals (Ferri et al. 2005). Considering the fact...Dementia – Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment and Ongoing care Dementia is a decline in cognitive function potentially caused by a number of disorders: Alzheimer dementia, Vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia and Frontotemporal dementia....Multi-infarct dementia – Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment and Ongoing care Multi-infarct dementia is a heterogeneous disorder caused by the sequel of cerebrovascular disease that manifests in cognitive impairment affecting memory, thinking, language, behavior, and judgment....Dementia in Parkinson Disease: Current Concepts in Neuropathology, Neuroanatomy and Neurochemistry The characterization of dementia in Parkinson disease has undergone over the past four decades a complex evolution parallel to advances in neurobehavioral cognitive sciences, neurochemistry,...Promising Strategies for Preventing Dementia Age is the greatest risk factor for dementia, with the prevalence of demen­tia nearly doubling with every five years of age. The oldest-old, which generally...Epidemiology – Intervention Strategies Against Dementia Identification of modifiable risk and protective factors for dementia provides potential for the primary prevention of the disease (Fratiglioni et al. 2008; Middleton and Yaffe...Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Dementia Vascular disease in the brain is a common cause of late-life cognitive impairment. It is estimated that up to 30% of stroke survivors have dis­abling...Pathophysiology of Behavioral and Psychological Disturbances in Dementia Although dementia is frequently thought of as an impairment in cogni­tion, a common and often overwhelming dilemma facing many families and clinicians is the presence...Relation of Apathy to Dementia in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease Apathy is often defined simply as a general loss of motivation. Marin (1996) added to this definition a reduction in goal-directed behavior and thought with...Cost of Illness Studies and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Dementia Worldwide direct costs of dementia have been estimated to be US$156 billion (Wimo, Jonsson, and Winblad 2006), and annual costs of patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms... Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

E-mail *

Website

Comment

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Interact with US: Follow us on Twitter.Subscribe RSS Feeds Subscribe to Health tips by EmailRead more great tips about:
Home Design

House and Home Tips

Smart travel

Tips for ITs
Top Posts & PagesAbscess, Psoas - Diagnosis, Treatment and Ongoing careHow long does it take to get in shape?6 Tips That Will Make Your Libido Soar - Boosting diet and Herbal remedies to restore low Sex driveSkin care solutions for Wounds, Scars or Stretch Marks5 Anti-Aging beauty tips - Facial exercise, hydrotherapy, Scalp massage, Skin needling and Stop thinning hairChlamydia Pneumoniae – Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment and Ongoing careFecal Impaction – Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment and Ongoing careThe art of Self-tanning and Tanning PillsPeriorbital cellulitisEvery skin type can benefit from exfoliating - what's best for you?Special Discounts!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Copyright:All content are property and copyright of their owners.

Copyright © health.tipsdiscover.com

rel=author">Jean-Paul Marat

CategoriesSelect Category365 Healthy days!!!Beverage   TeaCuriositiesDiet & Fitness   Diet      Diet tips      Fat burn      Mediterranean   Fitness      Aerobic      Cardio      Strength      YogaDiseases & Conditions   Addiction   Aids & Hiv   Allergies   Alphabetical      A      B      C      D      E      F      G      H      I      K      L      M      N      O      P      R      S      T      U      V      W      Z   Anatomy      Bone      Brain      Breast      Cardiovascular      Colon      Ear      Endocrine      Esophagus      Eye      Genetics      Genital      Hematologic      Intestinal      Kidney      Liver      Lungs      Mental      Musculoskeletal      Neurological      Nose      Oral cavity      Pancreas      Periodontal      Sexually transmitted disease      Skin      Stomach      Tongue   Anxiety   Back Pain   Bacteria   Cancer      Adrenal Gland      Anus      Bile Duct      Bladder      Bone Sarcomas      Brain      Breast Cancer      Carcinoids of the Gastrointestinal Tract      Cervical Cancer      Childhood      Colon      Colon Cancer      Common cancer      Esophagus      Gallbladder      Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor      Hematologic Cancer      Laryngeal Cancer      Lung cancer      Melanoma      Oral Cancer      Ovarian cancer      Pancreatic cancer      Prostate Cancer      Rectum      Retinoblastoma      The Leukemias      Therapy      Unknown Primary Site   Cholesterol   Cold & Flu   Depression   Diabetes   Headaches   Heart Disease   Infections   Menopause   Natural Remedies   Osteoporosis   Quit Smoking   Stroke   VirusLegal   Health Insurance   Life careMind and Body   Beauty      Hair      Skin care   Mind      Brain Improvement      Memory   personalityNutrition   Beans   Detoxification   Eat right   Fruits      Apple      Apricot      Banana      Cherrie      Grape      Grapefruit      Melon      Nectarines      Peaches      Pears      Plums   Grains   Herbs   Legumes   Recipes      Indonesian      Lamb      Pasta dish      Skillet      Thai   Spice   VegetablesWellness   Aging   Child’s health   Family Health   Men’s health   Oral care   Sleep   Stress   Women’s health

Health tips is proud to be powered by WordPressPrivacy Policy

// Don't use Pocket's default JS as it we need to force init new Pocket share buttons loaded via JS.function jetpack_sharing_pocket_init() {jQuery.getScript( 'https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/j/btn.js?v=1' );}jQuery( document ).on( 'ready', jetpack_sharing_pocket_init );jQuery( document.body ).on( 'post-load', jetpack_sharing_pocket_init );Send to Email AddressYour NameYour Email AddressCancelPost was not sent - check your email addresses!Email check failed, please try againSorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.%d bloggers like this:

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire